CNS tumors with PLAGL1-fusion: beyond ZFTA and YAP1 in the genetic spectrum of supratentorial ependymomas.

A novel methylation class, "neuroepithelial tumor, with PLAGL1 fusion" (NET-PLAGL1), has recently been described, based on epigenetic features, as a supratentorial pediatric brain tumor with recurrent histopathological features suggesting an ependymal differentiation. Because of the recent identification of this neoplastic entity, few histopathological, radiological and clinical data are available. Herein, we present a detailed series of nine cases of PLAGL1-fused supratentorial tumors, reclassified from a series of supratentorial ependymomas, non-ZFTA/non-YAP1 fusion-positive and subependymomas of the young. This study included extensive clinical, radiological, histopathological, ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation profiling) data for characterization. An important aim of this work was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a novel fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting the PLAGL1 gene. Using histopathology, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, we confirmed the ependymal differentiation of this new neoplastic entity. Indeed, the cases histopathologically presented as "mixed subependymomas-ependymomas" with well-circumscribed tumors exhibiting a diffuse immunoreactivity for GFAP, without expression of Olig2 or SOX10. Ultrastructurally, they also harbored features reminiscent of ependymal differentiation, such as cilia. Different gene partners were fused with PLAGL1: FOXO1, EWSR1 and for the first time MAML2. The PLAGL1 FISH presented a 100% sensitivity and specificity according to RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling results. This cohort of supratentorial PLAGL1-fused tumors highlights: 1/ the ependymal cell origin of this new neoplastic entity; 2/ benefit of looking for a PLAGL1 fusion in supratentorial cases of non-ZFTA/non-YAP1 ependymomas; and 3/ the usefulness of PLAGL1 FISH.

Measuring Safety and Outcomes for the Use of Compassionate and Off-Label Therapies for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer in the SACHA-France Study.

Importance: Innovative anticancer therapies for children, adolescents, and young adults are regularly prescribed outside their marketing authorization or through compassionate use programs. However, no clinical data of these prescriptions is systematically collected. Objectives: To measure the feasibility of the collection of clinical safety and efficacy data of compassionate and off-label innovative anticancer therapies, with adequate pharmacovigilance declaration to inform further use and development of these medicines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients treated at French pediatric oncology centers from March 2020 to June 2022. Eligible patients were aged 25 years or younger with pediatric malignant neoplasms (solid tumors, brain tumors, or hematological malignant neoplasms) or related conditions who received compassionate use or off-label innovative anticancer therapies. Follow up was conducted through August 10, 2022. Exposures: All patients treated in a French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFCE) center. Main Outcomes and Measures: Collection of adverse drug reactions and anticancer activity attributable to the treatment. Results: A total of 366 patients were included, with a median age of 11.1 years (range, 0.2-24.6 years); 203 of 351 patients (58%) in the final analysis were male. Fifty-five different drugs were prescribed, half of patients (179 of 351 [51%]) were prescribed these drugs within a compassionate use program, mainly as single agents (74%) and based on a molecular alteration (65%). Main therapies were MEK/BRAF inhibitors followed by multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In 34% of patients at least a grade 2 clinical and/or grade 3 laboratory adverse drug reaction was reported, leading to delayed therapy and permanent discontinuation of the innovative therapy in 13% and 5% of patients, respectively. Objective responses were reported in 57 of 230 patients (25%) with solid tumors, brain tumors, and lymphomas. Early identification of exceptional responses supported the development of specific clinical trials for this population. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of the SACHA-France (Secured Access to Innovative Medicines for Children with Cancer) suggested the feasibility of prospective multicenter clinical safety and activity data collection for compassionate and off-label new anticancer medicines. This study allowed adequate pharmacovigilance reporting and early identification of exceptional responses allowing further pediatric drug development within clinical trials; based on this experience, this study will be enlarged to the international level.

On the Hot-Plate Welding of Reactively Compatibilized Acrylic-Based Composites/Polyamide (PA)-12.

Joining of dissimilar thermoplastics and their composites is a challenge for thermal welding techniques due to different melting points. Reactive welding with an auxiliary functional material can offer the clear opportunities to develop joining processes due to robustness to joining dissimilar thermoplastic polymers and their composites. The current study employed reactive compatibilization to offer the possibility of joining an acrylic-based glass fiber composite to polyamide (PA)-12 by applying a hot-tool welding technique. For this purpose, composite plates are fabricated by a typical vacuum infusion and thin layer thermoplastic films are formed by a thermostamping of PA12 granules. Subsequently, the reactive welding of the interposed PA12 sheet and Elium®-GMA-Glass composite is conducted by hot-plate welding. A glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) as a compatibilizing agent is copolymerized with methyl methacrylate Elium® resin. During the hot-tool welding process of dissimilar thermoplastic material, GMA can react with the polyamide end groups. The heat distribution at the Elium® GMA/PA-12 interface is responsible for obtaining a strong joint. This study focuses on the functionality of the compatibilizer on the welding of acrylic-based composites with polyamide (PA)-12 while varying the assembly temperature. The flatwise tensile test proved the effectiveness of GMA on the interface bounding. The excellent bounding incompatible polymers Elium® resin (PMMA) and PA12 was achieved at 200 °C.

The French FRACTURE database: A way to improve knowledge on management of children with very rare tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Very rare pediatric tumors (VRTs), defined by an annual incidence ≤2 per million inhabitants, represent a heterogeneous group of cancers. Due to their extremely low incidence, knowledge on these tumors is scant. Since 2012, the French Very Rare Tumors Committee (FRACTURE) database has recorded clinical data about VRTs in France. This study aims: (a) to describe the tumors registered in the FRACTURE database; and (b) to compare these data with those registered in the French National Registry of Childhood Cancer (RNCE). METHODS: Data recorded in the FRACTURE database between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 were analyzed. In addition, these data were compared with those of the RNCE database between 2012 and 2015 to evaluate the completeness of the documentation and understand any discrepancies. RESULTS: A total of 477 patients with VRTs were registered in the FRACTURE database, representing 97 histological types. Of the 14 most common tumors registered in the RNCE (772 patients), only 19% were also registered in the FRACTURE database. Total 39% of children and adolescent VRTs registered in the RNCE and/or FRACTURE database (323 of a total of 828 patients) were not treated in or linked to a specialized pediatric oncology unit. CONCLUSION: VRTs represent many different heterogenous entities, which nevertheless account for 10% of all pediatric cancers diagnosed each year. Sustainability in the collection of these rare tumor cases is therefore important, and a regular systematic collaboration between the FRACTURE database and the RNCE register helps to provide a more exhaustive picture of these VRTs and allow research completeness for some peculiar groups of patients.

What does a non-response to induction chemotherapy imply in high-risk medulloblastomas?

PURPOSE: High-risk medulloblastomas (HR-MB) may not respond to induction chemotherapy, with either post-induction stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD). There is no consensus regarding their optimal management. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study investigated patients with non-responder HR-MB treated according to the PNET HR + 5 protocol (NCT00936156) between 01/01/2009 and 31/12/2018. After two courses of etoposide and carboplatin (induction), patients with SD or PD were analyzed. Upon clinician's decision, the PNET HR + 5 protocol was either pursued with tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (continuation group) or it was modified (switched group). RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were identified. After induction, 37 patients had SD and 12 had PD. The outcomes were better for the SD group: the 5-y PFS and OS were 52% (95% CI 35-67) and 70% (95% CI 51-83), respectively, in the SD group while the 2-y PFS and OS were 17% (95% CI 3-41) and 25% (95% CI 6-50), respectively, in the PD group (p < 0.0001). The PNET HR + 5 strategy was pursued for 3 patients in the PD group, of whom only one survived. In the SD group, it was pursued for 24/37 patients whereas 13 patients received miscellaneous treatments including a 36 Gy CSI in 12 cases. Despite that continuation and switched group were well-balanced for factors impacting the outcomes, the latter were better in the continuation group than in the switched group: the 5-y PFS were 78% (95% CI 54-90) versus 0% (p < 0.001), and the 5-y OS were 78% (95% CI 54-90) versus 56% (95% CI 23-79) (p = 0.0618) respectively. In the SD group, multivariate analysis revealed that MYC amplification, molecular group 3, and a switched strategy were independent prognostic factors for progression. CONCLUSION: Patients with post-induction SD may benefit from HDCT and CSI, whereas patients with early PD will require new therapeutic approaches.

Computerized pediatric oncology prescriptions review by pharmacist: A descriptive analysis and associated risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Systematic prescription analyses by clinical pharmacists result in pharmacist interventions (PIs) to reduce prescription errors and improve medication safety. PIs are particularly critical in oncology, because antineoplastic drugs are highly toxic with low therapeutic indexes especially in a pediatric population. The aim of this study is to describe PIs in a pediatric oncology department and to identify potential risk factors associated with prescription errors. PROCEDURE: We conducted a 20-month observational study in a pediatric oncology department concerning electronic prescription of injectable chemotherapies was conducted. PIs were analyzed for drug-related problems (DRPs), type of intervention, population characteristics, involved drugs, and the potential risk factors. RESULTS: Clinical pharmacists made 90 PIs for 10,214 antineoplastic prescriptions for a rate of 88 PIs per 10,000 prescriptions. The majority of DRPs were dosage errors (61.8%), imputable to measurements (weight and/or height) in 47.4% or unreported dose reduction. The most common patient ages were in the range 1-10 years and the most common time for medical double checks was 2-9 pm. There were statistically more prescription errors in standardized protocols (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Not surprisingly, PIs were predominantly to correct dose errors, half of which related to height and weight measurements that were not updated. No significant risk factors for errors were identified for errors except in the standardized status of prescription, which appears to be linked in part to our software that did not automatically reflect dose reduction from one course to the next. Medical double-checking followed by a clinical pharmacist's double check were effective in order to prevent prescription errors.